Blog
October 2026 · 7 min read
Business continuity

What is a Minimum Viable Company, and how do you define yours?

The plan says "switch to manual." Nobody knows what manual means. Defining the minimum your business must deliver turns that line into something people can run.

The short answer

A Minimum Viable Company (MVC) is the smallest version of your business that still serves customers and meets its core obligations during a severe disruption. You define it per critical service: the minimum volume, how long it must hold, the workarounds that deliver it, and the technology that must come back first to support it.

"Switch to manual." What does manual mean?

A key account calls the CEO during an outage. The CEO asks what the plan says. The plan says "switch to manual." Nobody in the room knows what manual means, which orders it covers, or how long it lasts.

That line sits in a lot of continuity plans. It describes an intention, with no volume, owner or duration attached. The Minimum Viable Company closes that gap: it states, in numbers, what the business must keep delivering while technology is down, and what that takes. Some teams call the same idea minimum viable operations. ISO 22301 calls it the minimum business continuity objective.

Define the minimum in numbers

Take a company that receives and ships customer orders. On a normal day it handles 120 orders. Thirty of them need same-day dispatch. After looking at customer consequences and commitments, the business agrees that the other orders can wait up to three days.

That gives you a minimum service level you can plan against: 30 same-day orders a day, for up to three days. Compare that with "keep order processing running." Only the first version tells IT, operations and suppliers what they must deliver.

In financial services, the same thinking sits behind impact tolerances. The minimum describes what you keep running to stay inside them.

Work backwards to what the minimum needs

Now trace what those 30 orders need. You have to receive them, identify them, allocate stock, pick them and arrange delivery. A smaller volume still needs most of the supporting services. The carrier connection doesn't become optional because you're shipping fewer parcels.

This is where workarounds get tested on paper first. Someone suggests processing the priority orders manually. Before you count on that, ask where the stock information comes from. In many companies it lives in the same environment that just went down. Manual processing only works if that information is independently accessible, protected, and has a way to record stock movements during the outage.

Check whether you can sustain it

Suppose the manual fallback handles 40 orders a day. That covers the 30 priority orders, as long as the team has the information and access it needs.

It also leaves 80 orders building up every day. After three days, 240 orders are waiting, assuming steady arrivals and no cancellations. Restoring normal capacity of 120 a day won't clear them, because new orders keep arriving at the same rate. IT can finish its recovery while operations still needs extra people and a way to reconcile the manual records.

Check the people side too. If the same team leads appear in three recovery procedures, they don't have three times the capacity.

Connect the minimum to IT recovery

The minimum and the recovery sequence have to describe the same service. Once the business has agreed the minimum, IT knows what to recover first, at what capacity and by when.

If the minimum can't be supported with today's capabilities, put that shortfall in front of someone who can decide: fund the fix, change the target, or accept the exposure explicitly.

A practical way to begin

  1. Pick one critical service and state its normal volume in numbers.
  2. Agree with the business the minimum that must continue, and how long everything else can wait.
  3. Define the workaround that delivers the minimum, and list the information, people and systems it needs.
  4. Calculate the backlog that builds up, and how long it takes to clear after recovery.
  5. Try the workaround with the people who would run it, for at least one full shift.

How we do this in resimate

In resimate, you define the Minimum Viable Company for each disruption scenario: which services must keep running, at what level, and with which workarounds. resimate then builds the recovery sequence from the real dependencies behind that minimum, service providers included. When a dependency changes, continuity plans flag the workarounds that are now missing. Teams go live in 4 to 6 weeks, on the data they already have.

FAQ

What is a Minimum Viable Company?

The smallest version of your business that still serves customers and meets its core obligations during a severe disruption, defined per critical service in volumes, durations and workarounds.

Is a Minimum Viable Company the same as the minimum business continuity objective?

Close. ISO 22301 defines the MBCO as the minimum acceptable level of products and services during a disruption. The Minimum Viable Company applies that idea across the whole company and connects it to workarounds and the IT recovery sequence.

What is the difference between a Minimum Viable Company and impact tolerance?

Impact tolerance sets the maximum disruption a service can take before the harm becomes intolerable. The Minimum Viable Company describes what you keep running to stay within it.

How do workarounds fit in?

Workarounds deliver the minimum in degraded mode, while technology is down. Each one needs its information sources, people, capacity and maximum duration defined, and a test with the people who run it.

How often should we review the Minimum Viable Company?

After every major change to services, volumes or suppliers, and after every exercise or real incident.
Author
Patrick Lechner is co-founder of resimate. He has 15 years of experience building and running cyber resilience and crisis management capabilities, as a Big4 Director and as VP, Head of IT and Security, with crisis work across cyber incidents, financial crises and humanitarian emergencies. He works side by side with resilience teams in financial services, critical infrastructure and technology, and that work is still the best part of his week.
Questions? Feedback?
We would love to hear from you. Please do not hesitate to contact us.

More resilience insights

Business continuity
6 min read

What makes a good business continuity plan?

Business continuity plans done the old way have one thing in common: nobody opens them when something breaks. The plans people use look different.
Operational resilience
7 min read

What makes a good operational resilience program?

Most resilience programs produce documents nobody opens during an incident. The good ones build a shared, current picture of how the business works, and use it to decide what to fix first.
Tech resilience
6 min read

Are your RTOs realistic?

Your RTO says 4 hours. Your real recovery chain says 7. Most organizations find out during the incident. Here's how to check before it.
Operational resilience
7 min read

What makes a good operational resilience program?

Most resilience programs produce documents nobody opens during an incident. The good ones build a shared, current picture of how the business works, and use it to decide what to fix first.
Business continuity
6 min read

What makes a good business continuity plan?

Business continuity plans done the old way have one thing in common: nobody opens them when something breaks. The plans people use look different.